Gaou
Team Owner
That's if he ever finishes those books
But it's great to hear some confirmation that D&D lost their minds and that bogus ending is not from GRRM. He wouldn't let my girl (and his favorite house ) to go out like that
that ending was trash. the unsullied would have put jon and the imp's head on pikes out front of king's landing and would have ruled
That's if he ever finishes those books
But it's great to hear some confirmation that D&D lost their minds and that bogus ending is not from GRRM. He wouldn't let my girl (and his favorite house ) to go out like that
I literally turned off the television when I realised the Bastard wouldn't face any repercussions for killing Dany. How the hell could Grey Worm just stand there and scowl at Jon Snow after he killed his Queen?
I don’t get the uproar of Dany dying. She was always established as the tragic, fallen hero corrupted by power.
It’s the REASONING and set up of it that was dumb to me.
I was expecting more of a war between Dany loyalist and John enthusiasts at the end but that didn’t happen.
And let’s not even mention John and how his crippled brother somehow is seen having a story fitting of the king.
Considering everyone's reaction to the ending of the show it better be different or GRRM might mess around and get cancelled like people did Charlaine Harris after True Blood ended.
Nah...Like you said, the uproar was not about her dying but rather the development (or lack thereof) of it. Rushed and poorly written. Bc by the end of s6, about half of the fans were convinced she was gonna go crazy like her dad
Considering everyone's reaction to the ending of the show it better be different or GRRM might mess around and get cancelled like people did Charlaine Harris after True Blood ended.
Nah...
I don’t think you get what I was referencing too. There’s a whole subreddit of folks that vehemently hate S6 just because Dany was killed.
You have another sect of fans who don’t like the idea that their hero was turned into a villain.
That’s what I meant by I didn’t understand. Both just as end points made sense to me.
The writer of the books. I remember the ending of the Sookie Stackhouse series did not go over well. Her fans were livid and many refused to touch anything with her name on it again. They may have calmed down as that was many years ago but it wouldn't surprise me if GOT fans do that with GRRM. He's already pushing people with all of these spin offs when the main story isn't finished. The man needs to stop playing around and finish the main series then he can cash in on everything else.Who was Charlaine? The writer of the books or the showrunner?
I really don’t think we’ll ever see GRRM finish, he’s too busy living off the money and fame he’s garnered since HBO picked it up.
I understand. Yes, there are people who would've been pissed either way even if they did her justice (like me ). But I'm telling you, majority of the fans and general population would've given d&d props had they executed the ending properly. About 90% of the uproar is about how sloppy everything was written/developed
The writer of the books. I remember the ending of the Sookie Stackhouse series did not go over well. Her fans were livid and many refused to touch anything with her name on it again. They may have calmed down as that was many years ago but it wouldn't surprise me if GOT fans do that with GRRM. He's already pushing people with all of these spin offs when the main story isn't finished. The man needs to stop playing around and finish the main series then he can cash in on everything else.
That's exactly what happened to Charlaine.Honestly....I can and will never be able to watch anything from the David and DB again.
Years ago I was taught there is no such thing as writer's block. Imagine that you're side by side with your writer, writing a story or movie together. The story is due come end of the month and you have a solid week left. All month you've had 'writer's block'. What do you think will happen at the end of the month when you have nothing to show for it? You'd probably be fired.Yeah, I’m glad you said it because I’ve found his reaction to the world wide fame to be off putting.
He’s so consumed with the attention rather than finishing what brought him fans to begin with. And I know he says he suffers from writers block, I can understand that, but it’s when you catch him out at every party and networking event, either playing up his celebrity status or egging fans and the media on about a book he hasn’t even begun to write. But then he has the audacity to go promote spin offs?
I think it’s just how bold he galavants around Hollywood doing this that gets me.
Nah...
I don’t think you get what I was referencing too. There’s a whole subreddit of folks that vehemently hate S6 just because Dany was killed.
You have another sect of fans who don’t like the idea that their hero was turned into a villain.
That’s what I meant by I didn’t understand. Both just as end points made sense to me.
too bad we won’t ever get to confirm it for ourselves
I don’t get the uproar of Dany dying. She was always established as the tragic, fallen hero corrupted by power.
It’s the REASONING and set up of it that was dumb to me.
I was expecting more of a war between Dany loyalist and John enthusiasts at the end but that didn’t happen.
And let’s not even mention John and how his crippled brother somehow is seen having a story fitting of the king.
Power doesn't corrupt it reveals. If power corrupts then every last one of the main cast is tainted. Sansa, Jon, Tyrion, all had power but not one of them are considered corrupted, just Dany. And for what? She had power for a long time and did not do what they made her do in the finale to civilians. She killed slavers, xes traffickers, etc but she did not intentionally go after civilians.
I wouldn’t take Reddit seriously. Most of the people who post on those forums are irrational. Believe it or not there are rational Dany fans that accepted her ending. What we didn’t accept was the way it was executed and D&D building a false case that there were “signs” that Dany was always a villain..
It’s a figure of speech hun.
It wasn’t patronizing, it was me trying to be polite to a very unnecessary comment.I'm not your hun. We are not familiar with each other and it comes off as patronizing.
You used the figure of speech to explain why you felt the ending for Dany made sense to you. Figures of speech are supposed to clarify and describe things in more detail. Were you not using this figure of speech to back up your opinion on Dany being the tragic hero and justifying her being murdered by Jon?
You stated your opinion as fact and I disagreed with your opinion that she was always established as the fallen hero. Power doesn't corrupt, it reveals the truth about characters. Robert Baratheon did not become a drunken abusive hoe when he became king, he was always an abusive hoe. He just had more freedom to do what he wanted once he became king.
Dany had her issues but when she attained power she used it mostly for good. Coldly picking off civilians on dragon back to get back at Cersei or anyone is not something she would have done. Not even to avenge Missandei. She would have captured Cersei and then set the b!tch on fire.
It wasn’t patronizing, it was me trying to be polite to a very unnecessary comment.
But now I will be,
GOODBYE HUN.
That is exactly what it was: patronizing and antagonistic.
Yes, to which I already told you was coming...
You don’t require any form of respect with me when your entire approach has been over the top, condescending and antagonistic from the jump. And now you wanna serial groan and for what? Just to be petty.
We’ve all been having a nice discussion here, if you want to engage, consider dropping the “grammar—semantics Nazi” act, it’s played.
bµllsh!t. My approach was perfectly fine. I asked you not to call me hun because we don't know each other. Nothing wrong with setting boundaries with strangers.
The rest of your comment is pure garbage. You must not be used to people disagreeing with you if you think my response was over the top, condescending, and antagonistic. I disagreed with your argument and calmly explained why without attacking you personally. I was engaging with you when I responded the first and second time. You chose to ignore that message. Now we are here.
Who was the one who responded with "it's a figure of speech".. Oh, that was you who posted that first, not me. If you don't want your own words thrown back in your face, then maybe you should be more careful.
Groan for Groan.
You have issues sis, your attitude is all throughout this post. It started long before I said hun. Like I said your spirit is nasty and your approach was wrong from the jump.
But congrats you’ve earned a spot on my ignore.