Anyone sick of this propaganda of trying to make us Northeast African/"Cushitics" some mongrel nation of people. why are we not fighting back, we are an ancient people that have existed for thousand of years, and we have origins not just some mix-mutt creature that just pop in East Africa, we have record of people who are older than Mota man found in Kenya that were identical to modern "Cushitics". The worst part is why are some Horn Africans buying into this sh!t.
>But but we are half nilotic
No, we are not we are separate groups that evolved independently, just because we can be modeled as half fµck!ng nilotics doesn't mean that we are, second Nilotics are not even pure East Africans (Ancient East Africans) they have Bantu, Niger-congo, and hunter gathering DNA
>But but we half Eurasian and sheet
What is "Eurasian"? such an ambiguous group. you mean "West Eurasians", you do realized that West Eurasians can be modeled as being half way between Asians, and a literal Sub-Saharan Africans (more African if you are from the middle east, or closer to it). So If anything West Eurasians (especially mid-east) are the ones that are mixed between Basal Eurasian (who lean toward Africans) and native Eurasians (similar to east Asians, and Australian aborigines).
European whites are a mix between native European hunter gatherers and middle eastern, no one call them mix.
If we are talking about modren Arabs they are more mongrel than the ancient ones, they have levant, Indian, Bantu dna, and it happened more recently, why is no one calling those sandis mongrels (which is why they are). But people try to use these Arabs as a proxy to show how mixed we are, the irony of it all. And don't get me started on North Africans aka the land of Quadroons and mulattos.
>But but we are half nilotic
No, we are not we are separate groups that evolved independently, just because we can be modeled as half fµck!ng nilotics doesn't mean that we are, second Nilotics are not even pure East Africans (Ancient East Africans) they have Bantu, Niger-congo, and hunter gathering DNA
>But but we half Eurasian and sheet
What is "Eurasian"? such an ambiguous group. you mean "West Eurasians", you do realized that West Eurasians can be modeled as being half way between Asians, and a literal Sub-Saharan Africans (more African if you are from the middle east, or closer to it). So If anything West Eurasians (especially mid-east) are the ones that are mixed between Basal Eurasian (who lean toward Africans) and native Eurasians (similar to east Asians, and Australian aborigines).
European whites are a mix between native European hunter gatherers and middle eastern, no one call them mix.
If we are talking about modren Arabs they are more mongrel than the ancient ones, they have levant, Indian, Bantu dna, and it happened more recently, why is no one calling those sandis mongrels (which is why they are). But people try to use these Arabs as a proxy to show how mixed we are, the irony of it all. And don't get me started on North Africans aka the land of Quadroons and mulattos.
Last edited: