eleiordache
cute lil neo-Nazi! :)
he had good taste in women
he had good taste in women
sometimes he had good taste in women not all the time lol
JMO but I disagree. Out of the all of the women (and there were many), I can count the ones who were actually worth his time on one hand...and I don't need the whole hand...
Brooke is not one of them btw bad:
he had good taste in women
Girl, if she could just confess to getting real intimate with him she could give us a proper reason to be mad :Ya'll just mad :
They definitely fooled around. Who does she think she's fooling? LOL
how they came about it i won't address this as for Brooke she was foul on so many levels but i will give her respect for not bashing him after they departed ways
Nice pictures...... but I question his taste in women
Girl, if she could just confess to getting real intimate with him she could give us a proper reason to be mad :
THIS. All day and every day. The whole Michael and Brooke thing reads like that first real relationship you have in high school and you swear you are soul mates...then you grow up and realize it wasn't that serious.Girl, if she could just confess to getting real intimate with him she could give us a proper reason to be mad :
I'm just kidding, Brooke gets on my last nerves with these "friendship" lies. : Brooke, we know ya'll got close at least once. Don't even play gurl.
Err... I have two questions:
First: how do you know (and why "at least once"?)
Second: why does she have to lie?
Because Michael said Brooke was one of his loves and she's always trying to brush him off as asexual/friend. Something doesn't add up there, so I figure that they had to have gotten a lil' intimate, and maybe discovered they were better off as friends. I think she's lying because she contradicts herself. Not like Michael didn't either. I just feel there is something more to the story.
Don't you believe Michael was asexual?
Because Michael said Brooke was one of his loves and she's always trying to brush him off as asexual/friend. Something doesn't add up there, so I figure that they had to have gotten a lil' intimate, and maybe discovered they were better off as friends. I think she's lying because she contradicts herself. Not like Michael didn't either. I just feel there is something more to the story.
Don't you believe Michael was asexual?
That's the reason why I believe he saw Brooke like he saw Princess Diana. She wouldve been nice for his image but not nice for himself. I believe he played around with that idea for years but finally let it go. Brooke said that she hadnt seen him before his death in 17 years (1992).Brooke is alright, I guess. It's just that She bores the life out of me. I'm still a doting Michael/whitney/Diana fan. : They had substance.
can't stand that bish!
We already have a thread, she doesn't deserve her own thread.
They made a cute couple years back.
That's what I thought in the early 90's too. They looked very classy together, reviving the Old Hollywood Glamour a bit. Back then I wished for her to be the one he would marry, hoping to see more of that happiness in his eyes when he was around her or speaking about her. I thought they would have made for an interesting couple.