Quantcast

New Zealand bans cattle exports by sea, with two-year phase out

Freja

Team Owner
Joined
Feb 27, 2015
Messages
111,699
Solutions
3
Reaction score
Reactions
658,898 274,392 8,221
767,190
Alleybux
574,800

NZ bans cattle exports by sea, with two-year phase out


THE New Zealand Government has this morning announced a ban on live cattle exports by sea, with a two-year period to phase out the trade.


“At the heart of our decision is upholding New Zealand’s reputation for high standards of animal welfare. We must stay ahead of the curve in a world where animal welfare is under increasing scrutiny,” Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor (left) said.

“This decision will affect some farmers, exporters, and importers and a transition period will enable the sector to adapt.”

New Zealand banned the export of livestock for slaughter in 2008 but has continued to allow the export of livestock for breeding or dairy production purposes, with a large percentage of the 110,000 NZ cattle exported last year shipped by sea to China.

The New Zealand Government says the trade that generates about $250 million in export dollars for the country each year, but members of the trade said the 110,000 cattle exported in 2020 were worth almost $350 million, and the trade was growing towards the $500 million mark this year.

The ban has come “as a a surprise” to NZ’s agriculture sector according to Federated Farmers animal welfare spokesperson, Wayne Langford.

“The Minister has said this is all about protecting New Zealand’s reputation as the most ethical producer of food in the world. Those farmers who support livestock exports would point out our trade in this sector operates to some of the highest animal welfare standards anywhere – standards that were further bolstered after last year’s Heron Report,” he said.

“Our farmers care deeply about animal welfare. The government has seen fit to bring in this ban but Federated Farmers has no information about any breaches of the high standards relating to livestock exports.”


The Gulf Livestock 1, formerly named the Rahmeh, was carrying 43 crew members and 5,867 dairy heifers from NZ to China when it disappeared during a Tyhpoon in the early hours of September 2., 2020 (Image: VesselFinder.Com)

The Heron Report, which followed the sinking of the Gulf Livestock 1 in a cyclone last September, led to further requirements including:
  • focused maritime inspection of livestock carrier ships entering New Zealand;
  • restricting stocking density on vessels to 90 percent of former limits;
  • increased requirements for voyage reporting, including daily veterinary reports during voyages;
  • increased minimum fodder requirements that ensure at least 20 per cent of feed is available for unplanned delays during the voyage.
“There is a contractual relationship with the companies receiving livestock from New Zealand at the export destination to have minimum standards in place, and these are monitored for 30 days after arrival of the animals,” Mr Langford said.

“But it is true that after then, New Zealand has no control over the future welfare of those animals.”

“The one encouraging aspect of the government’s announcement is the transition period of up to two years to enable those farmers with commitments in place to honour those commitments, and consider their options once live exports are off the table,” Mr Langford said.

Minister Damien O’Connor said the Ministry of Primary Industries (MPI) review of live exports, which started in 2019, identified mixed perceptions of the activity.

“There is split opinion about its long-term value and how it fits with the story we want to tell internationally to consumers. In its review submission, the independent National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC), which advises ministers on animal welfare issues, advised that the practice should stop.”

Mr O’Connor said improvements had been made to the practice over recent years, but despite everyone’s best efforts, the voyage times to our northern hemisphere markets will always pose animal welfare challenges.

Mr O’Connor said officials had spoken to key trading partners about the decision.

“I recognise the importance of our trade relationships with our international partners and we’re committed to working with them as we transition away from the shipment of livestock. New Zealand has an opportunity to boost trade through our cutting-edge scientific work into dairy cow genetics and germplasm use.”

“During the transition period, exporters will meet the extra requirements that we introduced following the independent Heron report, which was carried out after the tragic loss of the Gulf Livestock 1 in September 2020. I’ve asked MPI to provide further advice on improvements to animal welfare during the phase out.

“I want to thank all of those who took part in the wider review. The Government is committed to high animal welfare standards,” Damien O’Connor said.

The ban does not apply to animals moved by air.

“Clearly the periods are far shorter and generally they are well looked after. We have not had any indications of concerns about animal welfare for animals moved by air,” Mr O’Connor has told NZ media.

‘Ill-informed, massively consequential’ decision​


The Animal Genetics Trade Association called the ban an “ill-informed, massively consequential decision for the nation, to earn short-term political brownie points from a few activists”.

“This is an immoral ban against a trade being conducted humanely. There is no morality in removing half a billion dollars from our economy and forcing the early deaths of up to 150,000 animals a year,” AGTA spokesman Dave Hayman said.

New Zealand livestock exporter and veterinarian Corin Dann told Radio New Zealand this morning the industry did a first class job in the way it exported animals with 99.9pc of animals delivered to China safely.

“And that loss rate is no different to what you would have on a New Zealand farm,” he said.

“The average loss rate per ship is maybe two to five animals out of 5000.”

He said the trade last year was worth between $300m and $350m and this year was substantially up and heading toward $500 million worth of trade.

He said that banning the trade potentially put NZ’s important agricultural trade relationship with China, worth more than $20 billion, jeopardy.

Challenging suggestions livestock exports are being phased out around the world, Mr Dann said more than five million cattle are exported from various countries around the world each year, the majority of which are exported by NZ’s “natural trading partners” like France, Germany and Canada.

“All of our natural trading partners are heavily involved in exporting livestock, including Australia, including Ireland and the UK and including countries like Denmark and Holland,” he said.

“We have invested substantially in our business and yes this ban will cost a lot of jobs and it will be a real tragedy to shut it down if we don’t get to continue.”

No plans to suspend or ban live animals exports – Littleproud​


David-Littleproud-Twitter-300x300.png

Minister for Agriculture David Littleproud.

Australia’s Minister for Agriculture, Water and the Environment David Littleproud said the phasing out of NZ animal exports by sea is a matter for the New Zealand government “and Australia has no plans to suspend or ban live animal exports.”

“The Federal Government is confident in our standards, regulations and laws to ensure high standards of animal welfare for livestock exports,” he said.

“The Australian Government continues to support the live animal exports trade and its contribution to the Australian economy.”

Australian exporters sympathise with NZ farmers​


The Australian Livestock Exporters’ Council today expressed its sympathies with its New Zealand colleagues following NZ Government decision.

“This is understandably disappointing news, particularly for New Zealand producers that rely on the trade for competition in their livestock markets as well as their international trading partners,” ALEC chief executive officer Mark Harvey-Sutton said.

“It is important to note that the Australian and New Zealand industries are very different in terms of their scale, market dynamics and regulatory processes.

“The Australian industry will continue to be a world leader in livestock exports and continues play a critical role in providing food security for our trading partners as well as providing competition in the market for Australian producers,” he said.

“We have full confidence in the standards the Australian industry upholds and expect the impacts of the New Zealand decision to have limited bearing on the strength of the Australian industry and its continuing growth.”

NZ decision ‘wake-up call’ for Australia – RSPCA​


RSPCA Australia senior policy officer Dr Jed Goodfellow said the NZ decision should be a wake-up call for the Australian Government.

“The export of live animals has arguably damaged Australian farming’s reputation more than any other practice.

“It is inherently high-risk, with decades of repeated evidence of suffering and cruelty,” Dr Goodfellow said.

“We’ve seen tragedy after tragedy involving Australian animals on live export ships.

“Many thousands of animals have died while countless more have suffered terribly, but survived to face an uncertain fate overseas.”

 

femi94ce

Alley Onager
Joined
Nov 14, 2009
Messages
12,938
Reaction score
Reactions
64,027 1,637 717
66,640
Alleybux
213,092
Well now that's going to piss off a LOT of breeders. You just sold a prizewinning heifer to an Australian how the hell are you going to get her there? Executive class?

LAFF
 

banksy212

Triggering fonts like fleas on a Cl*t,
Joined
Jul 22, 2020
Messages
9,706
Reaction score
Reactions
99,223 6,176 2,312
115,211
Alleybux
718,578
Sheep is a huge export of New Zealand. So, if cattle exports by sea what is going to happen?

NZ economy is not doing well at all, before the pandemic, the economy was a mess.

As much as I understand the environmental concerns, I don’t think this decision is okay
 

Chaosbutterfly

Misappropriated Chanel
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
3,555
Reaction score
Reactions
42,245 867 306
50,156
Alleybux
212,800
....is the plan for them to fly?
I'm all about animal welfare and generally applaud all efforts to make meat production more ethical, but we have to be reasonable.
 

Freja

Team Owner
Joined
Feb 27, 2015
Messages
111,699
Solutions
3
Reaction score
Reactions
658,898 274,392 8,221
767,190
Alleybux
574,800
....is the plan for them to fly?
I'm all about animal welfare and generally applaud all efforts to make meat production more ethical, but we have to be reasonable.
No but maybe slaughter them in place? This has been discussed many times through the years since both meat and cattel travel around the globe just to be slaughtered and then the meat travel back. Imagine the fumes. And they suffer on the trips.
 

Chaosbutterfly

Misappropriated Chanel
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
3,555
Reaction score
Reactions
42,245 867 306
50,156
Alleybux
212,800
No but maybe slaughter them in place? This has been discussed many times through the years since both meat and cattel travel around the globe just to be slaughtered and then the meat travel back. Imagine the fumes. And they suffer on the trips.

But then wouldn't you have to freeze the meat?
Isn't the point of sending them live is so the meat will be fresh?
 

Freja

Team Owner
Joined
Feb 27, 2015
Messages
111,699
Solutions
3
Reaction score
Reactions
658,898 274,392 8,221
767,190
Alleybux
574,800
But then wouldn't you have to freeze the meat?
Isn't the point of sending them live is so the meat will be fresh?
Or they can put it on a plane then. But it's also a question about cost.Countries have these contract with each other they negoiate about so it can be cheaper for a company to slaughter the animals in a diffrent country. That is what happens now. They put live cattle on a ship to another country, slughter them there and then send the meat back.
 

new2this

General Manager
OLDHEAD
Joined
Dec 19, 2006
Messages
2,041
Reaction score
Reactions
19,071 933 127
19,343
Alleybux
167,044
Wow. This is lowkey huge

Yup. I think this serves two unspoken purposes 1. Deal a blow to China since most of the cattle are exported there. I suspect in retaliation for COVID. Also that talk about not knowing what happens to them after they arrive safely was pure shade.
2. Ensure that cattle resources are in place when the (what I am beginning to see is) inevitable war breaks out. So that New Zealand can be self sustainable.
 

Chaosbutterfly

Misappropriated Chanel
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
3,555
Reaction score
Reactions
42,245 867 306
50,156
Alleybux
212,800
Or they can put it on a plane then. But it's also a question about cost.Countries have these contract with each other they negoiate about so it can be cheaper for a company to slaughter the animals in a diffrent country. That is what happens now. They put live cattle on a ship to another country, slughter them there and then send the meat back.

Maybe, but that represents a small percentage of the trade for NZ.
And I'm sure they'd mostly have such deals with neighbors, like Australia, where they can expect quick turnaround and minimal costs.

The majority of NZ beef is going to places like China, Japan and the US, so the meat can be butchered and sold there. So I wonder about the logistics of transporting such big animals to these places by plane.
Like what is the plan, because they aren't going to get there any other way lol.

Source
 

Freja

Team Owner
Joined
Feb 27, 2015
Messages
111,699
Solutions
3
Reaction score
Reactions
658,898 274,392 8,221
767,190
Alleybux
574,800
Maybe, but that represents a small percentage of the trade for NZ.
And I'm sure they'd mostly have such deals with neighbors, like Australia, where they can expect quick turnaround and minimal costs.

The majority of NZ beef is going to places like China, Japan and the US, so the meat can be butchered and sold there. So I wonder about the logistics of transporting such big animals to these places by plane.
Like what is the plan, because they aren't going to get there any other way lol.

Source
I know Brazilian cattle travel a long way to get slaughtered and then the meat is going back or close to. It's ridiculous. Bad for the animals and bad for the environment.
 

Similar Threads

Trending Threads

News Alley

Ask LSA

General Alley

Top Bottom