Quantcast

The UN, ILGA, Stonewall and the Women’s Caucus: Jo Bartosch investigates calls for the removal of laws prohibiting xes with or between adolescents

CountingStars

Being Mad Because You’re a Gangstalker is Weird
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
17,241
Reaction score
Reactions
65,515 2,460 2,096
64,980
Alleybux
192,256
So they've thoroughly butchered Black feminist works (Angela Davis re: Prison Reform/carceral feminism, blah blah) and are now piggybacking to bring you the following absurdities:


Home Reports

The UN, ILGA, Stonewall and the Women’s Caucus: Jo Bartosch investigates calls for the removal of laws prohibiting xes with or between adolescents​

byJo Bartosch
April 13, 2021
in Reports
4 min read


The UN, ILGA, Stonewall and the Women’s Caucus: Jo Bartosch investigates calls for the removal of laws prohibiting sex with or between adolescents

Yesterday, Stonewall Scotland took to Twitter to deny that they support the lowering of the age of consent. The accusation was prompted by the discovery of a shadowy conference paper which appears to open the door to child abuse. The document was signed and promoted by ILGA World, an international organisation of which Stonewall Scotland are members.
Supporters of Stonewall Scotland have suggested this is a cynical attempt to link LGBT groups with paedophilia; a modern manifestation of the smear that gay men are more likely to abuse children. But underscoring claims and counter claims is a morally repugnant document that has been promoted internationally by well-funded bodies with links across the world.

You may also like​

Report from Iceland: LGB activists battle against “The National Queer Organisation of Iceland”

xes, money and alternative truths: Jo Bartosch on Stonewall’s “School & College Champions Awards”​

ONS concede defeat over xes question​

Activists from LGB Alliance India talk to Bev Jackson


In 2020, on the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Fourth World Conference on Women, 200 NGOs signed a so-called ‘feminist declaration’ which calls for the removal of laws prohibiting xes with or between adolescents, the abolition of laws prohibiting of certain forms of violence against women and the full decriminalisation of prostitution.
Here, couched in the language of human rights, is a call for a reduction in the age of consent.
ILGA World promoted the document describing it as “an alternative to the political declaration that outlines the steps necessary to achieve gender equality.” ILGA World is a global federation of more than 1,600 organisations from over 150 countries and territories “campaigning for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex human rights.” It counts amongst its UK membership a host of unions, Stonewall, Mermaids and even the British Council.
The ‘feminist declaration’ was the work of the Women’s Caucus, a collection of organisations which lobby on the fringes of the UN. The declaration is hosted on the website of the New York based NGO, the International Women’s Health Commission (IWHC). IWHC are described on their website as co-conveners of the Women’s Caucus. According to their most recent financial report, one of IWHC’s most generous donors is the Open Society Foundations (OSF) which gave in excess of $100,000 in 2018-19. OSF donate to many organisations which call for the full decriminalisation of the xes industry, and the replacement of xes-based rights with those based on gender identity.
One particularly troubling excerpt reads: “Eliminate all laws and policies that punish or criminalize same-xes intimacy, gender affirmation, abortion, HIV transmission non-disclosure and exposure, or that limit the exercise of bodily autonomy, including laws limiting legal capacity of adolescents, people with disabilities or other groups to provide consent to xes or xesual and reproductive health services.”
Despite sending requests for clarification to both the UN and to IWHC, no response has been forthcoming regarding the legal status of the document nor of the constitution of the Women’s Caucus.
One particularly troubling excerpt reads: “Eliminate all laws and policies that punish or criminalize same-xes intimacy, gender affirmation, abortion, HIV transmission non-disclosure and exposure, or that limit the exercise of bodily autonomy, including laws limiting legal capacity of adolescents, people with disabilities or other groups to provide consent to xes or xesual and reproductive health services.”
Here, couched in the language of human rights, is a call for a reduction in the age of consent. The World Health Organisation define adolescence as occurring between the ages of 10-19. Furthermore, the phrase “xesual and reproductive health services” ushers in the possibility of commercial xesual exploitation of adolescents in surrogacy and prostitution. Elsewhere in the document there is a commitment to “replacing punitive laws with comprehensive social interventions” with regard to issues including “female genital mutilation, domestic and intimate partner violence, and child, early and forced marriage.” This would seem to be a call for decriminalisation of some the most pernicious forms of violence against women and children.
Interestingly, the UN has some qualms about the type organisations with which they will work. Those who promote what are in effect laws that could lead to the rape of children are welcomed into the fold. Whereas grassroots organisations which promote women’s xes-based rights are not to be tolerated.

The Women’s Human Rights Campaign (WHRC) are a group pushing against the “replacement of xes with ‘gender identity’ on the grounds that it undermines women and girls’ rights.” Funded entirely by donations, WHRC paid $1,500 to exhibit at a virtual forum for NGOs and be included in the forum handbook. On 26 March 2021 the WHRC were removed from the online space on the grounds that they had ‘disrupted discussion’ during an event and made ‘offensive comments related to gender, gender identity and expression, xesual orientation, disability, mental illness, physical appearance, political affiliation, age, race, national and/or ethnic origin, immigration status, language, religion, or indigeneity’. WHRC co-ordinator, Jo Brew, contests this; “My only comment in chat during the whole event was that the opening meeting was inspiring” she said. “It is impossible for me to have done the things that they say that I have. Chat transcripts from conference events would confirm this.”

The story here extends far beyond lobby groups like ILGA and Stonewall. The Women’s Caucus document could legitimately be recognised as rolling-back every gain feminists have made over the past two hundred years. It is clear there are a host of organisations working at an international level to undermine basic human rights and moral boundaries.
 

CountingStars

Being Mad Because You’re a Gangstalker is Weird
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
17,241
Reaction score
Reactions
65,515 2,460 2,096
64,980
Alleybux
192,256
So repugnant there's women who seriously think they're morally superior because they believe rehabbing rapists and murderers is more noble than supporting women and children. Sick ass vultures.
 

CountingStars

Being Mad Because You’re a Gangstalker is Weird
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
17,241
Reaction score
Reactions
65,515 2,460 2,096
64,980
Alleybux
192,256
How did these groups get corrupted so quickly?

By co-opting others (racialized minorities, women, children, TS, intersex, lgb, prison reform), emotional exploitation/extortion, and intimidation. Plus they have powerful institutional allies:

Academia - took over feminist studies and humanities. They enact code for all new learners.

Politics - very monied bankrollers and language changes to law easily bought. Top-down reform often via stealth.

Activists - all shifted gears to transgenderism and gender (male-focused).

Tech platforms - Reddit and Twitter are the two main ones that revolve 100% around male culture and thought. From grooming to careers, they protect unsavory elements and create stars. They make the rules of engagement and are the thought leaders.

All feminist organizations have been transformed into having gender as their main focus to accommodate men.

MRAs.

And by suppressing research and opposing views. Plus, it's been like 20 years of strategizing and networking for them. Probably hit while the iron was hot with the insanity of the last few years.

They co-opt and subsume to create a superstructure. Aggressive acquisition of social cap.

Oh, and of course - by minting a new priest class and luring "experts" with prestige/money.

Forgot reporters and media. One's a tightrope walker (have to stay above the fray, y'know), and the other does whatever pays.
 
Last edited:

KelOverKenan

KelOverKenan did the thing
Joined
Apr 17, 2018
Messages
17,132
Reaction score
Reactions
251,415 7,654 2,236
312,506
Alleybux
115,238
How did these groups get corrupted so quickly?

"Empowerment" that doesn't infringe on patriarchy too much is rewarded while real empowerment is discouraged for being too "extreme", inconvenient, "misandrist", or just not financially beneficial.

There are literally hundreds of studies that show people get corrupted from watching and becoming addicted to pornography to the point that their desires get more and more extreme. Meanwhile instead of investigating why teen has become the most searched word on pδrn sites, they dance around it because pδrn is big bucks and men don't want to stop watching it. It's the same thing with questioning the current hypersexual culture in media geared to minors; it's money and men want to watch it.

We see this time and time again: Feminism that is palatable to men, doesn't change the status quo too much, and can easily be taken advantage of by the current framework of the patriarchy is the only type of feminism to be promoted. We saw this during second wave feminism where women wanted the right to achieve financial independence. At that point the economy wasn't as stable as it used to be so women got it, they needed more workers, but they didn't change the existing framework to promote equity between men and women in the workplace (i.e. issues regarding maternity leave, issues regarding women not being hired as often as men because they might get pregnant, issues regarding the second shift that could be solved by raising wages, etc).

Women trying to make changes within a patriarchal society is a gag. As long as the structure of the patriarchy exists, playing nice won't do jack.
 
Last edited:

rdvlvt

General Manager
Joined
Mar 5, 2021
Messages
4,505
Reaction score
Reactions
39,899 1,597 78
39,881
Alleybux
108,592
I'm sick to my stomach...and the fact that they removed WHRC tells me exactly which "women" these NGOs are aligned with
 

CountingStars

Being Mad Because You’re a Gangstalker is Weird
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
17,241
Reaction score
Reactions
65,515 2,460 2,096
64,980
Alleybux
192,256
I'm sick to my stomach...and the fact that they removed WHRC tells me exactly which "women" these NGOs are aligned with

It's so childish. They really made "woman" and "human rights" into a brand and posh club.
 

BornNotWorn

Starter
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Messages
106
Reaction score
Reactions
1,205 23 5
1,192
Alleybux
59,453
...And they highjacked the name of feminism to do it.

This is the culmination of some advanced level trolling on the part of rich and powerful MRAs. They are so blatant but there will always be pick me women out there with low critical thinking skills and a need to virtue signal to be their attack dogs.
 

CountingStars

Being Mad Because You’re a Gangstalker is Weird
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
17,241
Reaction score
Reactions
65,515 2,460 2,096
64,980
Alleybux
192,256
...And they highjacked the name of feminism to do it.

This is the culmination of some advanced level trolling on the part of rich and powerful MRAs. They are so blatant but there will always be pick me women out there with low critical thinking skills and a need to virtue signal to be their attack dogs.

I don’t know why they'd ride for these MRAs...I swear I never thought men were as stupid and lacking in intelligence until I started reading them online (their inner thoughts). Professors at that. Dumb as rocks.

That's the running theme and I know I'm being a jerk but sh!t...the idiocy just jumps out and they all swim in it.
 
Last edited:

CountingStars

Being Mad Because You’re a Gangstalker is Weird
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
17,241
Reaction score
Reactions
65,515 2,460 2,096
64,980
Alleybux
192,256
Am I right in thinking that this would effectively legalize child pδrn in which only minors appear?

Well you know some pretty prominent writers, psychologists, feminists (libfems), etc., are always trying to push the "maybe they like and enjoy it because they're xesual beings," (little adults) line. This prodding and angling at "consent" goes with it. More so a rationalization, excuse, and protection for predation. They're thinking ahead about their pet projects (maps, "virtuous" pedos).
 
Last edited:

I am just me

"Woman" is not a costume for your minstrel show
Joined
Dec 18, 2020
Messages
1,084
Reaction score
Reactions
7,200 226 46
7,475
Alleybux
96,571
One of the things that really made me mad with that IGLA manifesto was that they call it a "FEMINIST manifesto"... but not a single one of the supporting organizations is a feminist organization of any sort. It's just slapping a label on it that they think will make it seem like women support this nonsense.
 

CountingStars

Being Mad Because You’re a Gangstalker is Weird
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
17,241
Reaction score
Reactions
65,515 2,460 2,096
64,980
Alleybux
192,256
One of the things that really made me mad with that IGLA manifesto was that they call it a "FEMINIST manifesto"... but not a single one of the supporting organizations is a feminist organization of any sort. It's just slapping a label on it that they think will make it seem like women support this nonsense.

"Feminism" is a brand now like Gucci. They'll slap it on anything and everything.
 

MsFraser

Team Owner
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
7,648
Reaction score
Reactions
84,012 10,016 2,198
98,657
Alleybux
304,922
...And they highjacked the name of feminism to do it.

This is the culmination of some advanced level trolling on the part of rich and powerful MRAs. They are so blatant but there will always be pick me women out there with low critical thinking skills and a need to virtue signal to be their attack dogs.
Men, whether straight gay trans or pedophiles, have always had each other’s backs. They have made human rights a men’s rights movement.
 

Similar Threads

Ask LSA

The Lounge

General Alley

Top Bottom